Posts by Dan

    With a heavy heart I write this. I was just informed that our own Nate died this morning Sunday June 2014. He was spearfishing with a buddy from his boat out of Haulover. At this time I don't have more details than this article Deadly Diver Disaster On Haulover Beach. My condolences to his family and friends.


    MIAMI (CBSMiami) – A diver lost his life Sunday after he went missing on what was supposed to be a fun fishing trip at Haulover Beach.
    The diver was out spear fishing with his friend near 10350 Collins Ave on Sunday afternoon. Both divers were said to have gone underneath the water, but when the other diver came up he noticed his friend was missing, according to Miami Dade police.
    The friend called search units for help and after an intense search, the Marine Patrol found the missing man.
    The diver was taken to Haulover Park Marina and then transported to Aventura hospital where he was placed in critical condition.
    Doctors fought to keep him alive but he was pronounced dead.

    From Woman recounts rare shark attack in Fort Lauderdale’s Intracoastal


    [IMG2='left']https://spearfishing.world/image/shark-bite_zpseb6de01f.jpg[/IMG2]Jessica Vaughn hesitated to get into the water because it was “dark and murky.”“I didn’t like that I couldn’t see what was in there,” the 22-year-old said Monday as she clutched a toy stuffed dolphin.
    But she wanted to go tubing, so she jumped from her friend’s 22-foot Mako boat and swam on her back toward the yellow and blue tubes.
    That’s when she felt something hit her right leg.
    “It felt like a punch,” said Vaughn as she recounted her run-in with what is believed to have been a shark in the Intracoastal Waterway in Fort Lauderdale.
    It turned out to be more than a punch. The shark ripped into her leg with such force that it left deep teethmarks.
    In good spirits Monday, sporting an Ace bandage cast up to her knee and using a wheelchair, Vaughn described Sunday’s encounter as “scary.” She is recovering at Broward Health Medical Center in Fort Lauderdale.
    “I can’t believe it happened,” she said, through an occasional chuckle. “It’s definitely something you wouldn’t expect.”
    In fact, attacks by sharks in the brackish Intracoastal and not the salty ocean are extremely rare, said John Carlson, a shark expert with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
    “I can’t remember the last time there was a shark attack in an Intracoastal Waterway,” he said. “It was quite surprising to me when I heard about it.”
    The attack came as a shock to everyone — especially Peter Hogge, captain of the boat named Pie Rat.
    “We’ve seen them, but you never think someone would get bitten,” said Hogge, who frequently takes his boat out on the Intracoastal.
    On Sunday, the group of five got the boat ready about 11:30 a.m. for a long day of water and sun. They headed to the ocean, but couldn’t go tubing because the tide was too high. So they headed back to the Intracoastal, where there is a short speed zone.
    They were about 150 feet from his grandparents’ condo at Bayshore Towers. He tied the tubes to the boat and idled while Vaughn and Kyle Branston swam out.
    After Vaughn was bitten, Branston scooped her up and swam back to the boat.
    “If I panicked, they probably freak out some more,” Vaughn said about her reaction to the bite. “I thought there was a lot of blood.”
    Once at the dock, Hogge and some other friends used the boat’s first aid kit to apply a bandage above the wound to stop the bleeding.
    Fort Lauderdale Deputy Fire Chief Timothy Heiser said the department received a call about 1:30 p.m. Vaughn was already off the boat when rescuers arrived.
    “She was very well-bandaged,” Heiser said.
    While the boaters could not say what kind of shark it was, Carlson said it probably was a bull shark. The group described it as being about four feet long. “Bull sharks have a good tolerance” for conditions in an estuary like the Intracoastal, he said.
    Such attacks are rarely fatal, he said. “It bites the individual mistakenly and then leaves the vicinity.”
    Florida led the United States in shark attacks in 2013, according to the University of Florida.
    In October, a 6-year-old boy from Alabama survived a shark attack in Miami Beach. Logan Hamby was playing in the shallow waters off of the Deauville Beach Resort at 67th Street and the ocean when his family witnessed the attack.
    Logan had been playing in the water for only a couple of minutes when his stepmother, Donna, saw Logan being pulled underwater, screaming. Then she saw the fin.
    Donna’s husband, Ken, was the first to get to Logan. When he grabbed Logan to get him out of the water, the shark would not let go. Two men rushed to help Ken by punching the shark to get it to let go of Logan’s leg. The boy suffered deep puncture wounds.
    “When we go back to Miami, I'm only swimming in the swimming pool,” Logan said.
    Derek Burkholder, a research scientist at Nova Southeastern University’s Guy Harvey Research Institute, said “infection is one of the big issues with a shark bite.”
    “It's is an open wound,” Burkholder said. “They do have a lot of bacteria in their mouth.”
    Vaughn’s surgeon, Dr. Zoran Potparic, said Monday that Vaughn was lucky.
    “It was probably the largest shark bite that I have seen,” Potparic said. He said most of the damage was to the skin and blood vessels, although some of the leg muscles were affected by the “crush” of the shark’s jaws.
    Although Vaughn was rescued and is on the mend, Potparic said she is not out of danger. For the next few days, doctors plan to monitor her for infection. Her recovery, they estimated, will take three to four months.
    Meanwhile, Vaughn, who grew up in South Florida, said she is just happy it wasn’t worse. As a server at Bru’s Room in Sunrise, she does not have insurance. An account has been set up at www.gofundme.com/9rujd0 to help pay her medical expenses. By Monday evening, more than $6,000 had been raised toward a goal of $45,000.
    Vaughn said she loves the water and plans to go back in.
    “It’s a one in a million chance,” she said. “My luck, it happened.”


    Shark Attack In Fort Lauderdale - YouTube

    Looks very sharp :thumbup: I'd buy it just for the looks ehm! I mean so there's no reflection from the housing to scare off fish.


    Actually a couple of years back I was told by a military guy that they paint their GPs black so the reflection from the housing doesn't give away their position.

    No. There's no point to an open cell 1.5mm suit. A 1.5mm suit provides minimal thermal protection, it's more for environmental protection ie. sun, fire coral, jelly fish. It also offers a loading pad, and of course camo :)


    The Speardiver 1.5mm suits have an innovative feature. To maintain similar flexibility and comfort as the open cell suits, a special "Hyperstrech" material is used for the inside lining.

    No matter how good a particular reel is and how experienced the diver, the reel inherently comes with the potential to jam due to the line getting entangled in it or with another speargun component. Apart from some really freakish accident where the reel line can actually entangle the diver and not allow him to surface, there is a much more common way for a reel to kill a diver. Imagine this common scenario; an expensive $500 speargun, with a $150 reel and line, and a $500 GoPro/LCD bacpac/mount attached (total value well over $1000), diving 60ft (serious stuff for most of us) in bad vis with a stiff current over a reef with no prominent features. Diver is near the end of his breath hold stalking a fish, he shoots and hits it. Either the fish is big and strong and puts up a fight, or it holes up, or the shaft sticks in the bottom, and then the reel jams. At this point the diver really needs to surface, but he doesn't want to leave the gun. Letting go in these conditions means saying goodbye to $1000 worth of gear. But that's not a safety issue. The safety issue that most of us will take an extra few seconds to try and free the reel, or take out a knife and cut the line before making that decision, and by the time we do a blackout may be unavoidable. I know this because I was there when it happened to someone.


    Another dangerous aspect of the reel is that it not only puts the user at risk, but his dive buddies too. Another common scenario; a boat driver with 4 divers in the water with the divers spread out over a large area. The sea becomes a little choppy, and even floats without flags become difficult to spot. The diver with a reel and no float line/float is impossible for the driver to see until he dives and throws a leg up, or raises his gun out of the water. Suddenly one of the divers starts hollering at the boat to come over. It could be any one of serious problems; shark, blackout, entanglement, all the driver know is that he better get over there fast. But he can't until he knows exactly where each of the other 3 divers is, so as not to run them over on the way to the diver in need of help. This will cause a delay, possibly with serious consequences.


    For this reason on my boat everyone must have a float line, float and flag. I've seen guys try to get around this rule and use a reel saying that they'll stay near a diver that has a float. I find that inevitably they separate creating the same problem. Also I find them consistently selfish as they will shoot fish and instead of swimming them to the boat will clip them to the stringer on their buddy's float, increasing the drag and making the buddy work harder while they enjoy "the freedom" of the reel. For this reason another one of my rules is; all fish on my stringer are mine, if someone puts their fish on my stringer the fish now belongs to me.


    A float line by contrast is worry free. It's easy for the boat driver to know exactly where the divers are and to go collect them when they unknowingly ranged too far from the others, before they too disappear from sight even with the float and flag. No matter what happens I'm never concerned about losing my gear because there's a float at the end of the line. That's why it's called a float line, although some will argue it's because the line itself floats. In any case together with a highly visible dive flag the float will always allow me to find my gear. So if I feel I'm in trouble, all I do is let go of everything and surface. Actually it's a reflex for me to let go of the gun right after the shot (if I hit the fish that is) and after reach for the float line and play the fish or surface straight away if I feel I have to. So, If a float line is so safe then what are diver's reasons against it and for using a reel?


    BTW this is a good Spearfishing float line

    The way I see it there are two different approaches to float line color; visibility or stealth. People talk about wetsuit camo being effective or not. It's a fact that a float line scares fish, and is a bigger factor when trying to get close enough for a shot.





    Visibilty can be divided in two situation; on the surface and underwater. Visibility on the surface is a factor for me, spotting divers etc. Underwater not so much. If I had to choose between stealth and visibility, I choose stealth, because I have to get the fish first before I'll worry about seeing the line to retrieve it. In any case the float line is always attached to a float and you can follow it down from there.


    For these reasons I'm seriously considering the red/black color scheme. Red disappears underwater and the black breaks up the line, making this line arguably the least visible to fish underwater. Yet red is very visible on the surface where we need it. What do you think of my reasoning and general eye appeal of this color scheme?


    If there's demand I can do a lime yellow/white line at a later time.

    While Taiwan Sports without a doubt manufacture Rabitech and Mako spearguns, I don't think they manufacture any of the other brands you mentioned. They do have have pictures of the other brand's spearguns on their site. Some of the pictures show parts that look the same as the other brand's, but upon close inspection you can see they're copies and only somewhat similar. I suspect the legit pictures are borrowed without authorization, and used to draw the attention of potential buyers. So when you contact Taiwan Sports it will be like: "We don't actually have this speargun, but if you're interested we can copy it for you.".


    Trust me that in the case of spearguns not copied from reputable brands and actually designed by Taiwan Sports (that's to say by Daniel Hu) such as the Rabitech and Mako lines, they have some ridiculous and impractical features, which to the inexperienced spearo appear purposeful and innovative. This is because Daniel Hu doesn't dive or spear, so testing in a real environment was done only after the product was finalized. A running joke among legit Taiwanese spearos is that Daniel Hu can't even swim.

    This is the Chinese factory that manufactures Rabitech spearguns Taiwan Sports - Rabitech, they sell them under the brand name Master. If you send them an email I'm sure they'll direct you to whoever is selling them in the US.