One 18 mm band under tension from muzzle end to load tab on shaft. I'm not a physicist or even technically minded so I can't give you the equivalent coefficient this and that...but I can tell you what I enjoy shooting. I rarely swim with all three bands loaded. I know what I'm hunting so I load for that. With a single band roller I have the smooth release of a less powered up gun (one band loaded) but with the power and penetration of standard 2-3 bands. But the biggest benefit is in the fact that a shorter barreled gun, easier to maneuver, can now take a bigger fish in open water. When hunting caves and reef having a longer gun is a pain in the neck. The roller allows the convenience of the smaller gun without sacrificing to a large extent the power and range of a longer gun. I don't know if it matches or exceeds my current set up of my conventional hybrid, but the goal is to reduce the length of the barrel and still have the range and penetration of the longer gun at the power setting most used. And it does that exactly.
I'm not here to prove one way over another. I'm enjoying the new versatility of the roller concept. It has proven to be a new tool in my tool box that I REALLY enjoy using. I also enjoy my conventional set ups, and my Lance Ohara 8' three prong. I apologize if this threatens spearos that want to believe a conventional set up is as good as it gets. I'm not trying to preach the gospel of roller muzzles either. In the end, go shoot fish. That's what we all like to do. Shoot em with 14 mm bands, 16 mm bands, 1000000000 mm bands. Do it with a euro, a woody, or a hybrid. Slings or three prongs. We spend way too much time talking about shooting fish and not enough time doing it. IN fact I'm going to poke fish right now. So you all battle on about the physics. The only effort I'm going to put out is how am I going to prepare my catch today?
ALOHA!
Makoa